h4831sc Fundamentals Explained
h4831sc Fundamentals Explained
Blog Article
What's Absolutely everyone having excellent precision with for 180gr products and 4831? Just in search of a starting point so I don't waste a lot of parts. Many thanks for the help!
They've performed identically for me. Like Anyone else I rushed to find the newer SC version but have now switched again. Ideally you need about one hundred% loading density. For those who have sufficient circumstance capability for the H4831(extensive) you're probably superior off.
What is actually the primary difference? Compression. With no Excessive/weighty compression connected to the extensive grain 7828, the tension curve was altered and the load fell aside.
Sweet!! I'll choose some up and provides it a consider. Thanks fellas, I appreciate it! I will Enable you to really know what I determine. I do have a couple of half pound of 4350 I can test that initial and find out what takes place.
Novice to reloading. This will be useful for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I used to be capable of get my hands on a few lbs of h4831.
It's most likely that no even more discussion is needed, through which circumstance we endorse beginning a fresh thread. If on the other hand you really feel your reaction is needed it is possible to continue to accomplish that.
I'm making use of it with a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as correct. RL22 did properly but I used to be slightly h4831sc load data worried about temp steadiness. I feel I am at 72 grains and acquire close to 2850ish fps
Like said over, same things. All that is different is the scale of the kernels. I did listen to someplace that they're going to only make the SC Sooner or later. I do not know if that's real or not but would make sense to me. I take advantage of SC since which is what I located in the eight lb jug and it really works.
You could both: one) Carry on and also have the firearm(s) listed under automatically faraway from your shopping cart:
locutus reported: I even now have a great stockpile of H450, the ball powder equal of 4831, which flows via my powder actions easily.
Regardless of the similarity in nomenclature, they're wholly distinctive powders, with IMR 4831 remaining considerably more rapidly as opposed to Hodgdon variants. Never deal with them as the identical powder, since they most absolutely will not be.
Back to previous internet site Shut If there is anything at all as part of your cart, it won't be brought more than on the aged site.
Southwest Idaho I tried H4831sc in my 300 WM but experienced significantly better speed and h4831 vs h4831sc precision with H1000. I would fairly use a slower burning powder with 215g products.
If I've a pound or two of the powder and acquire much more of precisely the same, only a unique large amount number, I'll blend h4831sc all of them up so that I've a homogeneous batch of powder with which to operate.